Learn the Power of Your Subconscious Mind

This little experiment will only take you less than 30 seconds and it will demonstrate to you how your mind can bend reality. This experiment came to me as an insight on my vacation in Alberta, Canada last September. Watch the video to get all the details and then leave your thoughts below.

Get my Abundance Training here: More Money Now








Related Posts on this topic


Have an opinion? Comments welcome.

275 Comments so far

  1. coleen012No Gravatar on March 2, 2010 7:20 pm

    [..YouTube..] Cool!

  2. stephenmartileNo Gravatar on March 2, 2010 7:49 pm

    [..YouTube..] Hi coleen012,

    Did you give it a shot?

  3. SteveNo Gravatar on March 3, 2010 1:52 pm

    Great video, I’m going to try it out. I believe it will work. I tried the “car parks” mentioned in “The Secret” and that works for me 90% of the time. For example, I used to work at a University, and the lot closest to my building was always full by 8am. 5 or 6 times I waited more than 20min., still nothing. I saw the secret, saw the part about the guy lining up “car parks” as he puts it & started visualizing. The last 3 months I work there, 70% of the time there was an empty stall or someone just pulling out, about 25% I would wait about 5 to 10 minutes. This works just about any where I go now. I try your jar opening and let you know. thxs for the video.

  4. SteveNo Gravatar on March 3, 2010 1:54 pm

    Hey Steve,

    I’ve never thought of trying this with a parking lot – thanks for sharing,

  5. lifeboostNo Gravatar on March 3, 2010 6:19 pm

    [..YouTube..] Ironically, this kind of situation happened to me. I could not unlock my car door as the lock sticks from time to time. I tried to unlock it 10 of fifteen times without success. After i imagine what it would feel like once the door is open…sure enough, two more tries and the door was opened. Coincidence?

  6. YunNo Gravatar on March 3, 2010 3:59 pm

    Right on. Like the word you choose: “bend reality.” very gentle. I’d say “mess up your reality to your disadvantage”. Like the video, I might use it for my class… Thanks.

  7. stephenmartileNo Gravatar on March 3, 2010 10:04 pm

    [..YouTube..] no coincidences…. great story :)

  8. miracleman91No Gravatar on March 7, 2010 6:35 pm

    [..YouTube..] haha every video of yours never ceases to amaze me :)

  9. schumit7No Gravatar on March 23, 2010 12:42 am

    [..YouTube..] if i want someone to come to me and speak to me( and not vice-versa), can i make it happen?

  10. stephenmartileNo Gravatar on March 23, 2010 9:03 am

    [..YouTube..] @schumit7:

    ….that depends….. what I’m really curious about is why are you not approaching this other person?

  11. Sk8McDNo Gravatar on April 22, 2010 11:47 pm

    [..YouTube..] First of all, im SO glad that I stumbled upon your videos! I recently went through an intensive Gyrotonic training and I was inspired about the power of energy. I watched the secret over the weekend and I have been hooked!

    On tuesday, I was running on the treadmill at the gym and there was a window in front of me looking out to a moderately busy pathway between two streets. I decided to predict the shirt color, hair color, gender of the people that would walk by. It worked almost everytime!

  12. stephenmartileNo Gravatar on April 24, 2010 10:29 am

    [..YouTube..] @Sk8McD:

    Awesome… thanks for your comment :)

  13. britt521No Gravatar on May 22, 2010 6:13 pm

    [..YouTube..] does anybody else notice that weird ringin noise in the backround??

  14. JxonDanyNo Gravatar on September 3, 2010 7:41 pm

    [..YouTube..] Good job steve. Ive been doing the same thing for quite some time now and especially for traffic and sometimes even getting into concerts that were sold out. It was as magical as putting my arm out and getting a free wristband slapped on it for free with no questions asked. We do create reality with our thoughts, and relaxation appears to the be key.

  15. smartandstupid37No Gravatar on December 4, 2010 6:36 pm

    [..YouTube..] this kind of stuff happens to me all the time! im considered a lucky person because i use this technique ALL the time ^.^

  16. TheNobleBardNo Gravatar on December 10, 2010 10:39 pm

    [..YouTube..] Cool video, but not what I was looking for. I was looking for a video on actually bending reality. I.E. turning off a lamp from across the room or spawning a Ferrari outside my house just by thinking about it.

  17. stephenmartileNo Gravatar on December 30, 2010 4:39 pm

    [..YouTube..] @TheNobleBard: I haven’t figured out how to magically create a Ferrari out of thin air… BUT I will be sure to let you know how to do it as soon as my belief system catches up with my imagination :-)

  18. TheNobleBardNo Gravatar on December 31, 2010 8:56 pm

    [..YouTube..] @stephenmartile I’m sure whoever discovered that would be a very rich man. I did severely enjoy your video however and actually tested it. It actually worked! For those who know me know I have a terribly difficult time opening lockers. Well one day I was at work just trying to get home and my locker absolutely would not open for me. So I remembered your video and stood there for ten seconds and thought “Wouldn’t it be nice if this locker would open.” I tried it again and it popped open! Thanks!

  19. luciddreeamsNo Gravatar on January 11, 2011 9:03 pm

    [..YouTube..] i like your shirt

  20. jmstew3104No Gravatar on February 1, 2011 3:39 pm

    [..YouTube..] wondering if this would be like considered something similar to a placebo. Although I think scientists have difficulty explaining the effectiveness of inert tablets or sham surgeries. Either way, this is difficult to explain through concrete methods.

  21. TheHaloShotgunNo Gravatar on February 6, 2011 9:38 pm

    [..YouTube..] WEIRD

  22. MariaJose89No Gravatar on April 6, 2011 12:59 am

    [..YouTube..] Nice video, I think there is a deeper purpose to bending reality. I personally define bending reality as using your inner energy,spirit or what ever you want to call it to change certain things in the external world. I’m not saying the ability to move cars with your mind or anything in that nature, but to change situations or people through your inner being. Some might be more sentive than others to perceive this, but my point is you can bring forth a change from within. Just an opinion :)

  23. stephenmartileNo Gravatar on April 18, 2011 7:58 pm

    [..YouTube..] @MariaJose89:

    Hey Maria – there is not a doubt that you or anyone else can. It just takes practice and becoming aware of this great connection between outer and inner worlds – and how we are always matching our outer world to our inner world…

  24. abdulrehman6475No Gravatar on May 20, 2011 11:51 pm

    [..YouTube..] Hey Steve Thsi ketchup opening thing really works. Do you think i could use a somewhat similar technique to get better grades at uni?? (alongwith studies obviously)

  25. FishpiggNo Gravatar on May 22, 2011 2:07 pm

    [..YouTube..] ok so whats with the high pitched sound ? you running some sorta sub- liminals on us ?

  26. deathtamer666No Gravatar on May 26, 2011 12:23 am

    [..YouTube..] you arnt bending reality, your changing you perspective. their is a difference

  27. stephenmartileNo Gravatar on June 22, 2011 7:04 am

    [..YouTube..] @deathtamer666: It’s the same thing because your attention is what creates your reality…

  28. deathtamer666No Gravatar on June 22, 2011 3:23 pm

    [..YouTube..] @stephenmartile
    re·al·i·ty

    noun /rēˈalətē/ 
    realities, plural

    The world or the state of things as they actually exist, as opposed to an idealistic or notional idea of them

    your perception of reality is not reality. their is a difference.

  29. stephenmartileNo Gravatar on June 22, 2011 8:20 pm

    [..YouTube..] @deathtamer666:

    …”the world or state of things as they actually exist…”

    And how do you define the world or state as it exists? Based on who’s perspective?

    Someone must observe this objective Universe, but who?

    The world and state of things can only exist if that state is observed… and that observation can only exist by observing through your own beliefs, values and everything that you have ever been taught!

    In other words, your observation of reality is what creates your reality.

  30. deathtamer666No Gravatar on June 22, 2011 8:28 pm

    [..YouTube..] @stephenmartile reality is generally regarded as collective perspective, not the perspective of a single individual. No one entity can observe what is around them and regard it truly as reality, unless this perspective is regarded as the same by many others.

  31. sweeetlyNo Gravatar on July 9, 2011 5:06 pm

    [..YouTube..] Cool I do that in traffic. Also someone taught me how to open jars and such with chi.
    Great stuff! :)

  32. sinoplesNo Gravatar on July 23, 2011 12:40 pm

    [..YouTube..] Huuum, is already married ! Such attractive character ! Who invented monogamy?@?

  33. MrGatwardNo Gravatar on August 7, 2011 5:12 am

    [..YouTube..] @deathtamer666 Double slit experiment, look it up. Or maybe Einsteins special relativity, Schrodinger’s cat, entanglement, Heisenberg s uncertainty principle, whatever floats your boat.

  34. deathtamer666No Gravatar on August 7, 2011 6:30 am

    [..YouTube..] @MrGatward After a some research i have found that none of the examples actually make any current topic (save for the Schrodinger’s cat topic and that only vaguely has to do with it). Are you sure that you replied to the correct person? If so then please state what your point is.

  35. Gary190tubeNo Gravatar on August 7, 2011 6:07 pm

    [..YouTube..] So you’re saying “your mind can shape the future” by accepting that it will happen.

    After the 4-minute mile was broken, it went from “it might not be possible” to “it’s entirely achievable”. Suddenly everyone was doing the 4-minute mile.

    You’re making it possible to open the jar because you’ve already seen it happen in your mind. The doubt has gone.

    (If you need to figure out something hard, pretend you ALREADY KNOW the answer but you simply forgot it. Try to “recall” the answer.)

  36. eyealphaomegaNo Gravatar on August 8, 2011 4:08 pm

    [..YouTube..] It’s Called Zen.

  37. MegaGiggitymanNo Gravatar on August 12, 2011 2:48 pm

    [..YouTube..] your perception is your reality and vise versa

  38. MrGatwardNo Gravatar on August 16, 2011 9:38 am

    [..YouTube..] @deathtamer666 Pretty much that idealism is reality and that r perception of reality is in fact reality

  39. deathtamer666No Gravatar on August 16, 2011 11:48 am

    [..YouTube..] @MrGatward eh, i would bother posting my counter argument to that but i am getting tired of this meaningless bickering and wish to continue with better and more interesting topics.

  40. SteveNo Gravatar on August 17, 2011 8:37 am

    …what could be more interesting and fun than creating your own reality?

  41. thethirdqNo Gravatar on August 25, 2011 7:49 pm

    [..YouTube..] Awesome video! Please keep me posted…

  42. younggunner90No Gravatar on September 2, 2011 9:23 pm

    [..YouTube..] your delusional

  43. itsmedontuseeNo Gravatar on September 4, 2011 6:37 pm

    [..YouTube..] @younggunner90 lol

  44. itsmedontuseeNo Gravatar on September 4, 2011 6:40 pm

    [..YouTube..] @younggunner90 Dude don’t use this type of proof! People will think you are crazy which doesn’t matter btw but in a sense that they get away with it. I like to argue so amazingly that people who called me delusional have to make themselves delusional or believe me. and they always make themselves delusional hahahas shiiit! People are not stupid btw they are just sheep and blind! lol hahah

  45. itsmedontuseeNo Gravatar on September 4, 2011 6:41 pm

    [..YouTube..] the comment was for stephen but i wanted you to read just see how delusional you can make yourself.lolhahaha

  46. greenthumbguy1No Gravatar on September 4, 2011 11:55 pm

    [..YouTube..] Perception is not reality, and you didn’t “bend” reality, merely shifted your perspective.

  47. ChewedandPollutedNo Gravatar on September 11, 2011 10:45 pm

    [..YouTube..] 2:20 is my fave cuz you get real excited when you think of pickles,lol, awesome.
    what would the ketchup taste like? what would the mustard taste like? what ever it is, the jar ah PICKLES!….
    For real though I really did enjoy this video, thanks a bunch.

  48. COZYTWNo Gravatar on September 14, 2011 6:48 am

    [..YouTube..] Huh. So for someone to perceive the world makes it reality, changing our minds can bend reality…
    INCEPTION

  49. HDzTrollNo Gravatar on September 15, 2011 6:15 pm

    [..YouTube..] troll physics much

  50. XehanortNobodyNo Gravatar on September 30, 2011 1:06 am

    [..YouTube..] @greenthumbguy1

    And how can you know reality if it isnt through your perspective? Based on what can you know reality? All your senses are electromagnetic interpretation your brain sends. And by the way double slit experiment did prove that observation can change reality, the difference is that it can do so when it is in a wavefunction (possibility) not in a collapsed or objective state.

    If you could revert the objective reality into its wavefunction form you could re-write it.

  51. lightbrownpoopNo Gravatar on October 7, 2011 2:15 pm

    [..YouTube..] @stephenmartile that’s why so many people are sick, miserable and unsuccessful. their perception of reality confirms their programmed negative beliefs during childhood.

  52. stephenmartileNo Gravatar on October 8, 2011 5:12 pm

    [..YouTube..] @lightbrownpoop: Absolutely

  53. stephenmartileNo Gravatar on October 8, 2011 5:12 pm

    [..YouTube..] @lightbrownpoop: Absolutely

  54. superdahohoNo Gravatar on October 16, 2011 5:18 am

    [..YouTube..] @stephenmartile
    you seem like a reasonable guy who welcomes a difference in opinion, so i’m just ganna jump right in =)
    I agree with deathamer, you’re experience reality through your perspective, by changing your perspective you change how you experience reality but not reality itself. traffic gets smoother because you waited not because your mind changed it.

    imagine all the starving kids in africa, all they ever think about is food but they don’t recieve what their minds are willing.

  55. superdahohoNo Gravatar on October 16, 2011 5:18 am

    [..YouTube..] @stephenmartile
    you seem like a reasonable guy who welcomes a difference in opinion, so i’m just ganna jump right in =)
    I agree with deathamer, you’re experience reality through your perspective, by changing your perspective you change how you experience reality but not reality itself. traffic gets smoother because you waited not because your mind changed it.

    imagine all the starving kids in africa, all they ever think about is food but they don’t recieve what their minds are willing.

  56. superdahohoNo Gravatar on October 16, 2011 5:18 am

    [..YouTube..] @stephenmartile
    you seem like a reasonable guy who welcomes a difference in opinion, so i’m just ganna jump right in =)
    I agree with deathamer, you’re experience reality through your perspective, by changing your perspective you change how you experience reality but not reality itself. traffic gets smoother because you waited not because your mind changed it.

    imagine all the starving kids in africa, all they ever think about is food but they don’t recieve what their minds are willing.

  57. superdahohoNo Gravatar on October 16, 2011 5:18 am

    [..YouTube..] @stephenmartile
    you seem like a reasonable guy who welcomes a difference in opinion, so i’m just ganna jump right in =)
    I agree with deathamer, you’re experience reality through your perspective, by changing your perspective you change how you experience reality but not reality itself. traffic gets smoother because you waited not because your mind changed it.

    imagine all the starving kids in africa, all they ever think about is food but they don’t recieve what their minds are willing.

  58. superdahohoNo Gravatar on October 16, 2011 5:18 am

    [..YouTube..] @stephenmartile
    you seem like a reasonable guy who welcomes a difference in opinion, so i’m just ganna jump right in =)
    I agree with deathamer, you’re experience reality through your perspective, by changing your perspective you change how you experience reality but not reality itself. traffic gets smoother because you waited not because your mind changed it. 

    imagine all the starving kids in africa, all they ever think about is food but they don’t recieve what their minds are willing.

  59. superdahohoNo Gravatar on October 16, 2011 5:18 am

    [..YouTube..] @stephenmartile
    you seem like a reasonable guy who welcomes a difference in opinion, so i’m just ganna jump right in =)
    I agree with deathamer, you’re experience reality through your perspective, by changing your perspective you change how you experience reality but not reality itself. traffic gets smoother because you waited not because your mind changed it.

    imagine all the starving kids in africa, all they ever think about is food but they don’t recieve what their minds are willing.

  60. jeroenhaanNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 4:08 pm

    [..YouTube..] @superdahoho
    Maybe that food in a not (yet) available “collapsed wavefunction”? (see XehanortNobody his post below yours)
    Maybe it works only when it is a realistic option like with affirmations?
    Just my thought.
    Cheers

  61. jeroenhaanNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 4:08 pm

    [..YouTube..] @superdahoho
    Maybe that food in a not (yet) available “collapsed wavefunction”? (see XehanortNobody his post below yours)
    Maybe it works only when it is a realistic option like with affirmations?
    Just my thought.
    Cheers

  62. jeroenhaanNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 4:08 pm

    [..YouTube..] @superdahoho
    Maybe that food in a not (yet) available “collapsed wavefunction”? (see XehanortNobody his post below yours)
    Maybe it works only when it is a realistic option like with affirmations?
    Just my thought.
    Cheers

  63. jeroenhaanNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 4:08 pm

    [..YouTube..] @superdahoho
    Maybe that food in a not (yet) available “collapsed wavefunction”? (see XehanortNobody his post below yours)
    Maybe it works only when it is a realistic option like with affirmations?
    Just my thought.
    Cheers

  64. jeroenhaanNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 4:08 pm

    [..YouTube..] @superdahoho
    Maybe that food in a not (yet) available “collapsed wavefunction”? (see XehanortNobody his post below yours)
    Maybe it works only when it is a realistic option like with affirmations?
    Just my thought.
    Cheers

  65. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 6:13 pm

    [..YouTube..] @XehanortNobody
    waves interact with objects by contact, release energy and absorb energy that pertains information
    brainwaves is strictly limited inside the mind.
    at most it acts within a perpendicular dimension to the physical world

    if you ever taken physics, not even the hard kind, just mere physics you’ll understand
    it takes energy to cause motions which will “make things happen”
    the property the brainwaves is created biologically and received inside the mind.

  66. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 6:13 pm

    [..YouTube..] @XehanortNobody
    waves interact with objects by contact, release energy and absorb energy that pertains information
    brainwaves is strictly limited inside the mind.
    at most it acts within a perpendicular dimension to the physical world

    if you ever taken physics, not even the hard kind, just mere physics you’ll understand
    it takes energy to cause motions which will “make things happen”
    the property the brainwaves is created biologically and received inside the mind.

  67. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 6:13 pm

    [..YouTube..] @XehanortNobody
    waves interact with objects by contact, release energy and absorb energy that pertains information
    brainwaves is strictly limited inside the mind.
    at most it acts within a perpendicular dimension to the physical world

    if you ever taken physics, not even the hard kind, just mere physics you’ll understand
    it takes energy to cause motions which will “make things happen”
    the property the brainwaves is created biologically and received inside the mind.

  68. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 6:13 pm

    [..YouTube..] @XehanortNobody
    waves interact with objects by contact, release energy and absorb energy that pertains information
    brainwaves is strictly limited inside the mind.
    at most it acts within a perpendicular dimension to the physical world

    if you ever taken physics, not even the hard kind, just mere physics you’ll understand
    it takes energy to cause motions which will “make things happen”
    the property the brainwaves is created biologically and received inside the mind.

  69. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 6:13 pm

    [..YouTube..] @XehanortNobody
    waves interact with objects by contact, release energy and absorb energy that pertains information
    brainwaves is strictly limited inside the mind.
    at most it acts within a perpendicular dimension to the physical world

    if you ever taken physics, not even the hard kind, just mere physics you’ll understand
    it takes energy to cause motions which will “make things happen”
    the property the brainwaves is created biologically and received inside the mind.

  70. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 6:13 pm

    [..YouTube..] @XehanortNobody
    waves interact with objects by contact, release energy and absorb energy that pertains information
    brainwaves is strictly limited inside the mind.
    at most it acts within a perpendicular dimension to the physical world

    if you ever taken physics, not even the hard kind, just mere physics you’ll understand
    it takes energy to cause motions which will “make things happen”
    the property the brainwaves is created biologically and received inside the mind.

  71. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 6:13 pm

    [..YouTube..] @XehanortNobody
    waves interact with objects by contact, release energy and absorb energy that pertains information
    brainwaves is strictly limited inside the mind.
    at most it acts within a perpendicular dimension to the physical world

    if you ever taken physics, not even the hard kind, just mere physics you’ll understand
    it takes energy to cause motions which will “make things happen”
    the property the brainwaves is created biologically and received inside the mind.

  72. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 6:22 pm

    [..YouTube..] @jeroenhaan
    that’s a good analysis but brain waves do not travel outside of the body
    nor can it travel like radio waves.

    let’s assume you’re a singularity,
    within your body, your “waves” receives no constructive nor de-constructive interference.
    and you think to yourself, “grow taller, grow bigger, grow smarter”
    the reality is…you don’t
    you’ll still look UP and still cannot overpower those who are bigger than you.
    Actions and motions are needed to bring about change

  73. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 6:22 pm

    [..YouTube..] @jeroenhaan
    that’s a good analysis but brain waves do not travel outside of the body
    nor can it travel like radio waves.

    let’s assume you’re a singularity,
    within your body, your “waves” receives no constructive nor de-constructive interference.
    and you think to yourself, “grow taller, grow bigger, grow smarter”
    the reality is…you don’t
    you’ll still look UP and still cannot overpower those who are bigger than you.
    Actions and motions are needed to bring about change

  74. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 6:22 pm

    [..YouTube..] @jeroenhaan
    that’s a good analysis but brain waves do not travel outside of the body
    nor can it travel like radio waves.

    let’s assume you’re a singularity,
    within your body, your “waves” receives no constructive nor de-constructive interference.
    and you think to yourself, “grow taller, grow bigger, grow smarter”
    the reality is…you don’t
    you’ll still look UP and still cannot overpower those who are bigger than you.
    Actions and motions are needed to bring about change

  75. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 6:22 pm

    [..YouTube..] @jeroenhaan
    that’s a good analysis but brain waves do not travel outside of the body
    nor can it travel like radio waves.

    let’s assume you’re a singularity,
    within your body, your “waves” receives no constructive nor de-constructive interference.
    and you think to yourself, “grow taller, grow bigger, grow smarter”
    the reality is…you don’t
    you’ll still look UP and still cannot overpower those who are bigger than you.
    Actions and motions are needed to bring about change

  76. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 6:22 pm

    [..YouTube..] @jeroenhaan
    that’s a good analysis but brain waves do not travel outside of the body
    nor can it travel like radio waves.

    let’s assume you’re a singularity,
    within your body, your “waves” receives no constructive nor de-constructive interference.
    and you think to yourself, “grow taller, grow bigger, grow smarter”
    the reality is…you don’t
    you’ll still look UP and still cannot overpower those who are bigger than you.
    Actions and motions are needed to bring about change

  77. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 6:22 pm

    [..YouTube..] @jeroenhaan
    that’s a good analysis but brain waves do not travel outside of the body
    nor can it travel like radio waves.

    let’s assume you’re a singularity,
    within your body, your “waves” receives no constructive nor de-constructive interference.
    and you think to yourself, “grow taller, grow bigger, grow smarter”
    the reality is…you don’t
    you’ll still look UP and still cannot overpower those who are bigger than you.
    Actions and motions are needed to bring about change

  78. XehanortNobodyNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 7:59 pm

    [..YouTube..] @superdahoho

    Still look at doube split experiment, obvervation actually in the wavefunction level cause matter to behave differently, the cause behind it is irrelevant for the topic.

    In wavefunction the subjetive can actually define the objective. See double slit experiment, apparently there are 2 states. Wavefunction and particle. The problem is that we live in a particle state. If you could revert the universe to wavefunction and then meassure it properly you could change it.

  79. XehanortNobodyNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 7:59 pm

    [..YouTube..] @superdahoho

    Still look at doube split experiment, obvervation actually in the wavefunction level cause matter to behave differently, the cause behind it is irrelevant for the topic.

    In wavefunction the subjetive can actually define the objective. See double slit experiment, apparently there are 2 states. Wavefunction and particle. The problem is that we live in a particle state. If you could revert the universe to wavefunction and then meassure it properly you could change it.

  80. XehanortNobodyNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 7:59 pm

    [..YouTube..] @superdahoho

    Still look at doube split experiment, obvervation actually in the wavefunction level cause matter to behave differently, the cause behind it is irrelevant for the topic.

    In wavefunction the subjetive can actually define the objective. See double slit experiment, apparently there are 2 states. Wavefunction and particle. The problem is that we live in a particle state. If you could revert the universe to wavefunction and then meassure it properly you could change it.

  81. XehanortNobodyNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 7:59 pm

    [..YouTube..] @superdahoho

    Still look at doube split experiment, obvervation actually in the wavefunction level cause matter to behave differently, the cause behind it is irrelevant for the topic.

    In wavefunction the subjetive can actually define the objective. See double slit experiment, apparently there are 2 states. Wavefunction and particle. The problem is that we live in a particle state. If you could revert the universe to wavefunction and then meassure it properly you could change it.

  82. XehanortNobodyNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 7:59 pm

    [..YouTube..] @superdahoho

    Still look at doube split experiment, obvervation actually in the wavefunction level cause matter to behave differently, the cause behind it is irrelevant for the topic.

    In wavefunction the subjetive can actually define the objective. See double slit experiment, apparently there are 2 states. Wavefunction and particle. The problem is that we live in a particle state. If you could revert the universe to wavefunction and then meassure it properly you could change it.

  83. XehanortNobodyNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 7:59 pm

    [..YouTube..] @superdahoho

    Still look at doube split experiment, obvervation actually in the wavefunction level cause matter to behave differently, the cause behind it is irrelevant for the topic.

    In wavefunction the subjetive can actually define the objective. See double slit experiment, apparently there are 2 states. Wavefunction and particle. The problem is that we live in a particle state. If you could revert the universe to wavefunction and then meassure it properly you could change it.

  84. XehanortNobodyNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 8:00 pm

    [..YouTube..] @superdahoho

    We know the method of how to collapse a wavefunction into a particle, it has been done albeit in a VERY small scale in labs. But we dont know the method to revert the particle to a wavefunction of possibilities.

  85. XehanortNobodyNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 8:00 pm

    [..YouTube..] @superdahoho

    We know the method of how to collapse a wavefunction into a particle, it has been done albeit in a VERY small scale in labs. But we dont know the method to revert the particle to a wavefunction of possibilities.

  86. XehanortNobodyNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 8:00 pm

    [..YouTube..] @superdahoho

    We know the method of how to collapse a wavefunction into a particle, it has been done albeit in a VERY small scale in labs. But we dont know the method to revert the particle to a wavefunction of possibilities.

  87. XehanortNobodyNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 8:00 pm

    [..YouTube..] @superdahoho

    We know the method of how to collapse a wavefunction into a particle, it has been done albeit in a VERY small scale in labs. But we dont know the method to revert the particle to a wavefunction of possibilities.

  88. XehanortNobodyNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 8:00 pm

    [..YouTube..] @superdahoho

    We know the method of how to collapse a wavefunction into a particle, it has been done albeit in a VERY small scale in labs. But we dont know the method to revert the particle to a wavefunction of possibilities.

  89. XehanortNobodyNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 8:00 pm

    [..YouTube..] @superdahoho

    We know the method of how to collapse a wavefunction into a particle, it has been done albeit in a VERY small scale in labs. But we dont know the method to revert the particle to a wavefunction of possibilities.

  90. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 8:40 pm

    [..YouTube..] @XehanortNobody
    two problems.
    first even if know how, what’s said in the video is not yet possible. not even close to a practical level
    he’s convinced by his own fantasy
    2nd, I am not sure what you said is true but even if you are, you’re talking about quantum particles.
    waves that travels among the physical dimension and interact with certain machinery.

    brainwaves are pulses detected within the brain, does not bring forth direct realistic motions or changes other than the person’s behavior.

  91. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 8:40 pm

    [..YouTube..] @XehanortNobody
    two problems.
    first even if know how, what’s said in the video is not yet possible. not even close to a practical level
    he’s convinced by his own fantasy
    2nd, I am not sure what you said is true but even if you are, you’re talking about quantum particles.
    waves that travels among the physical dimension and interact with certain machinery.

    brainwaves are pulses detected within the brain, does not bring forth direct realistic motions or changes other than the person’s behavior.

  92. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 8:40 pm

    [..YouTube..] @XehanortNobody
    two problems.
    first even if know how, what’s said in the video is not yet possible. not even close to a practical level
    he’s convinced by his own fantasy
    2nd, I am not sure what you said is true but even if you are, you’re talking about quantum particles.
    waves that travels among the physical dimension and interact with certain machinery.

    brainwaves are pulses detected within the brain, does not bring forth direct realistic motions or changes other than the person’s behavior.

  93. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 8:40 pm

    [..YouTube..] @XehanortNobody
    two problems.
    first even if know how, what’s said in the video is not yet possible. not even close to a practical level
    he’s convinced by his own fantasy
    2nd, I am not sure what you said is true but even if you are, you’re talking about quantum particles.
    waves that travels among the physical dimension and interact with certain machinery.

    brainwaves are pulses detected within the brain, does not bring forth direct realistic motions or changes other than the person’s behavior.

  94. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 8:40 pm

    [..YouTube..] @XehanortNobody
    two problems.
    first even if know how, what’s said in the video is not yet possible. not even close to a practical level
    he’s convinced by his own fantasy
    2nd, I am not sure what you said is true but even if you are, you’re talking about quantum particles.
    waves that travels among the physical dimension and interact with certain machinery.

    brainwaves are pulses detected within the brain, does not bring forth direct realistic motions or changes other than the person’s behavior.

  95. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 8:40 pm

    [..YouTube..] @XehanortNobody
    two problems.
    first even if know how, what’s said in the video is not yet possible. not even close to a practical level
    he’s convinced by his own fantasy
    2nd, I am not sure what you said is true but even if you are, you’re talking about quantum particles.
    waves that travels among the physical dimension and interact with certain machinery.

    brainwaves are pulses detected within the brain, does not bring forth direct realistic motions or changes other than the person’s behavior.

  96. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 8:40 pm

    [..YouTube..] two problems.
    first even if know how, what’s said in the video is not yet possible. not even close to a practical level
    he’s convinced by his own fantasy
    2nd, I am not sure what you said is true but even if you are, you’re talking about quantum particles.
    waves that travels among the physical dimension and interact with certain machinery.

    brainwaves are pulses detected within the brain, does not bring forth direct realistic motions or changes other than the person’s behavior.

  97. XehanortNobodyNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 8:59 pm

    [..YouTube..] @superdahoho

    I am not per se defending the video. My point is that it is indeed possible to affect objective reality with consiosuness. If the reason for this are brainwaves, the consiosuness chosing one possibility over the others or whatever it doesnt change the fact that it can. It has been done in labs.

    Again the issue is the difference between particle state and wavefunction state. I think you misunderstood what wavefunction is, let me try to explain to you.

  98. XehanortNobodyNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 8:59 pm

    [..YouTube..] @superdahoho

    I am not per se defending the video. My point is that it is indeed possible to affect objective reality with consiosuness. If the reason for this are brainwaves, the consiosuness chosing one possibility over the others or whatever it doesnt change the fact that it can. It has been done in labs.

    Again the issue is the difference between particle state and wavefunction state. I think you misunderstood what wavefunction is, let me try to explain to you.

  99. XehanortNobodyNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 8:59 pm

    [..YouTube..] @superdahoho

    I am not per se defending the video. My point is that it is indeed possible to affect objective reality with consiosuness. If the reason for this are brainwaves, the consiosuness chosing one possibility over the others or whatever it doesnt change the fact that it can. It has been done in labs.

    Again the issue is the difference between particle state and wavefunction state. I think you misunderstood what wavefunction is, let me try to explain to you.

  100. XehanortNobodyNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 8:59 pm

    [..YouTube..] @superdahoho

    I am not per se defending the video. My point is that it is indeed possible to affect objective reality with consiosuness. If the reason for this are brainwaves, the consiosuness chosing one possibility over the others or whatever it doesnt change the fact that it can. It has been done in labs.

    Again the issue is the difference between particle state and wavefunction state. I think you misunderstood what wavefunction is, let me try to explain to you.

  101. XehanortNobodyNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 8:59 pm

    [..YouTube..] @superdahoho

    I am not per se defending the video. My point is that it is indeed possible to affect objective reality with consiosuness. If the reason for this are brainwaves, the consiosuness chosing one possibility over the others or whatever it doesnt change the fact that it can. It has been done in labs.

    Again the issue is the difference between particle state and wavefunction state. I think you misunderstood what wavefunction is, let me try to explain to you.

  102. XehanortNobodyNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 8:59 pm

    [..YouTube..] @superdahoho

    I am not per se defending the video. My point is that it is indeed possible to affect objective reality with consiosuness. If the reason for this are brainwaves, the consiosuness chosing one possibility over the others or whatever it doesnt change the fact that it can. It has been done in labs.

    Again the issue is the difference between particle state and wavefunction state. I think you misunderstood what wavefunction is, let me try to explain to you.

  103. XehanortNobodyNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 8:59 pm

    [..YouTube..] I am not per se defending the video. My point is that it is indeed possible to affect objective reality with consiosuness. If the reason for this are brainwaves, the consiosuness chosing one possibility over the others or whatever it doesnt change the fact that it can. It has been done in labs.

    Again the issue is the difference between particle state and wavefunction state. I think you misunderstood what wavefunction is, let me try to explain to you.

  104. XehanortNobodyNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 9:02 pm

    [..YouTube..] @superdahoho

    at the quantum level a electron, when it hit the wall the electron didnt appeared at 1 place but at all possible places it could appear from being shot in that situation. This is the “wavefunction” which means a state of the universe that is POSSIBLE, meaning not yet defined. When they tried to observe why the electron did that, it only appeared at 1 place.

    The problem is that the the macro level of the universe is set already in a defined state, not in a wavefunction.

  105. XehanortNobodyNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 9:02 pm

    [..YouTube..] @superdahoho

    at the quantum level a electron, when it hit the wall the electron didnt appeared at 1 place but at all possible places it could appear from being shot in that situation. This is the “wavefunction” which means a state of the universe that is POSSIBLE, meaning not yet defined. When they tried to observe why the electron did that, it only appeared at 1 place.

    The problem is that the the macro level of the universe is set already in a defined state, not in a wavefunction.

  106. XehanortNobodyNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 9:02 pm

    [..YouTube..] @superdahoho

    at the quantum level a electron, when it hit the wall the electron didnt appeared at 1 place but at all possible places it could appear from being shot in that situation. This is the “wavefunction” which means a state of the universe that is POSSIBLE, meaning not yet defined. When they tried to observe why the electron did that, it only appeared at 1 place.

    The problem is that the the macro level of the universe is set already in a defined state, not in a wavefunction.

  107. XehanortNobodyNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 9:02 pm

    [..YouTube..] @superdahoho

    at the quantum level a electron, when it hit the wall the electron didnt appeared at 1 place but at all possible places it could appear from being shot in that situation. This is the “wavefunction” which means a state of the universe that is POSSIBLE, meaning not yet defined. When they tried to observe why the electron did that, it only appeared at 1 place.

    The problem is that the the macro level of the universe is set already in a defined state, not in a wavefunction.

  108. XehanortNobodyNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 9:02 pm

    [..YouTube..] @superdahoho

    at the quantum level a electron, when it hit the wall the electron didnt appeared at 1 place but at all possible places it could appear from being shot in that situation. This is the “wavefunction” which means a state of the universe that is POSSIBLE, meaning not yet defined. When they tried to observe why the electron did that, it only appeared at 1 place.

    The problem is that the the macro level of the universe is set already in a defined state, not in a wavefunction.

  109. XehanortNobodyNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 9:02 pm

    [..YouTube..] @superdahoho

    at the quantum level a electron, when it hit the wall the electron didnt appeared at 1 place but at all possible places it could appear from being shot in that situation. This is the “wavefunction” which means a state of the universe that is POSSIBLE, meaning not yet defined. When they tried to observe why the electron did that, it only appeared at 1 place.

    The problem is that the the macro level of the universe is set already in a defined state, not in a wavefunction. 

  110. XehanortNobodyNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 9:02 pm

    [..YouTube..] at the quantum level a electron, when it hit the wall the electron didnt appeared at 1 place but at all possible places it could appear from being shot in that situation. This is the “wavefunction” which means a state of the universe that is POSSIBLE, meaning not yet defined. When they tried to observe why the electron did that, it only appeared at 1 place.

    The problem is that the the macro level of the universe is set already in a defined state, not in a wavefunction.

  111. XehanortNobodyNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 9:10 pm

    [..YouTube..] If we were able to switch from wavefunction to “defined” and viceversa, you would indeed be able to manipulate “reality”. My point is not to say the video guy is right but to point that it is indeed possible to affect reality without physical interaction.

  112. XehanortNobodyNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 9:10 pm

    [..YouTube..] If we were able to switch from wavefunction to “defined” and viceversa, you would indeed be able to manipulate “reality”. My point is not to say the video guy is right but to point that it is indeed possible to affect reality without physical interaction.

  113. XehanortNobodyNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 9:10 pm

    [..YouTube..] If we were able to switch from wavefunction to “defined” and viceversa, you would indeed be able to manipulate “reality”. My point is not to say the video guy is right but to point that it is indeed possible to affect reality without physical interaction.

  114. XehanortNobodyNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 9:10 pm

    [..YouTube..] If we were able to switch from wavefunction to “defined” and viceversa, you would indeed be able to manipulate “reality”. My point is not to say the video guy is right but to point that it is indeed possible to affect reality without physical interaction.

  115. XehanortNobodyNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 9:10 pm

    [..YouTube..] If we were able to switch from wavefunction to “defined” and viceversa, you would indeed be able to manipulate “reality”. My point is not to say the video guy is right but to point that it is indeed possible to affect reality without physical interaction.

  116. XehanortNobodyNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 9:10 pm

    [..YouTube..] If we were able to switch from wavefunction to “defined” and viceversa, you would indeed be able to manipulate “reality”. My point is not to say the video guy is right but to point that it is indeed possible to affect reality without physical interaction.

  117. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 9:18 pm

    [..YouTube..] @XehanortNobody
    lol, I know what wave functions are. but what you said does not explain how consciousness of the mind can effect reality.
    the “possible” you described first need to change the universe entirely to one governed by waves.
    that means abandoning or changing of laws of physics, re- engineer the world.
    at this point you might as well call upon the force of magic and such. No the way our world works.
    the only way a mind can bring forth change is through the action of the thinker.

  118. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 9:18 pm

    [..YouTube..] @XehanortNobody
    lol, I know what wave functions are. but what you said does not explain how consciousness of the mind can effect reality.
    the “possible” you described first need to change the universe entirely to one governed by waves.
    that means abandoning or changing of laws of physics, re- engineer the world.
    at this point you might as well call upon the force of magic and such. No the way our world works.
    the only way a mind can bring forth change is through the action of the thinker.

  119. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 9:18 pm

    [..YouTube..] @XehanortNobody
    lol, I know what wave functions are. but what you said does not explain how consciousness of the mind can effect reality.
    the “possible” you described first need to change the universe entirely to one governed by waves.
    that means abandoning or changing of laws of physics, re- engineer the world.
    at this point you might as well call upon the force of magic and such. No the way our world works.
    the only way a mind can bring forth change is through the action of the thinker.

  120. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 9:18 pm

    [..YouTube..] @XehanortNobody
    lol, I know what wave functions are. but what you said does not explain how consciousness of the mind can effect reality.
    the “possible” you described first need to change the universe entirely to one governed by waves.
    that means abandoning or changing of laws of physics, re- engineer the world.
    at this point you might as well call upon the force of magic and such. No the way our world works.
    the only way a mind can bring forth change is through the action of the thinker.

  121. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 9:18 pm

    [..YouTube..] @XehanortNobody
    lol, I know what wave functions are. but what you said does not explain how consciousness of the mind can effect reality.
    the “possible” you described first need to change the universe entirely to one governed by waves.
    that means abandoning or changing of laws of physics, re- engineer the world.
    at this point you might as well call upon the force of magic and such. No the way our world works.
    the only way a mind can bring forth change is through the action of the thinker.

  122. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 9:18 pm

    [..YouTube..] @XehanortNobody
    lol, I know what wave functions are. but what you said does not explain how consciousness of the mind can effect reality.
    the “possible” you described first need to change the universe entirely to one governed by waves.
    that means abandoning or changing of laws of physics, re- engineer the world.
    at this point you might as well call upon the force of magic and such. No the way our world works.
    the only way a mind can bring forth change is through the action of the thinker.

  123. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 9:18 pm

    [..YouTube..] @XehanortNobody
    lol, I know what wave functions are. but what you said does not explain how consciousness of the mind can effect reality.
    the “possible” you described first need to change the universe entirely to one governed by waves.
    that means abandoning or changing of laws of physics, re- engineer the world.
    at this point you might as well call upon the force of magic and such. No the way our world works.
    the only way a mind can bring forth change is through the action of the thinker.
    

  124. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 9:18 pm

    [..YouTube..] lol, I know what wave functions are. but what you said does not explain how consciousness of the mind can effect reality.
    the “possible” you described first need to change the universe entirely to one governed by waves.
    that means abandoning or changing of laws of physics, re- engineer the world.
    at this point you might as well call upon the force of magic and such. No the way our world works.
    the only way a mind can bring forth change is through the action of the thinker.

  125. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 9:30 pm

    [..YouTube..] @XehanortNobody
    radio receivers or machinery can detect waves that are traveling within space,
    say a robot that receives the signal via electro-magnetic waves will begin to move and behavior
    if that’s what you’re arguing then yes, waves CAN move physical objects.
    the same applies electric and gravitational forces. (then there’s the whole Einstien’s space & time curvature thing which says there’s no gravity attraction but let’s not get into that)
    let’s just say we both agree on that.

  126. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 9:30 pm

    [..YouTube..] @XehanortNobody
    radio receivers or machinery can detect waves that are traveling within space,
    say a robot that receives the signal via electro-magnetic waves will begin to move and behavior
    if that’s what you’re arguing then yes, waves CAN move physical objects.
    the same applies electric and gravitational forces. (then there’s the whole Einstien’s space & time curvature thing which says there’s no gravity attraction but let’s not get into that)
    let’s just say we both agree on that.

  127. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 9:30 pm

    [..YouTube..] @XehanortNobody
    radio receivers or machinery can detect waves that are traveling within space,
    say a robot that receives the signal via electro-magnetic waves will begin to move and behavior
    if that’s what you’re arguing then yes, waves CAN move physical objects.
    the same applies electric and gravitational forces. (then there’s the whole Einstien’s space & time curvature thing which says there’s no gravity attraction but let’s not get into that)
    let’s just say we both agree on that.

  128. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 9:30 pm

    [..YouTube..] @XehanortNobody
    radio receivers or machinery can detect waves that are traveling within space,
    say a robot that receives the signal via electro-magnetic waves will begin to move and behavior
    if that’s what you’re arguing then yes, waves CAN move physical objects.
    the same applies electric and gravitational forces. (then there’s the whole Einstien’s space & time curvature thing which says there’s no gravity attraction but let’s not get into that)
    let’s just say we both agree on that.

  129. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 9:30 pm

    [..YouTube..] @XehanortNobody
    radio receivers or machinery can detect waves that are traveling within space,
    say a robot that receives the signal via electro-magnetic waves will begin to move and behavior
    if that’s what you’re arguing then yes, waves CAN move physical objects.
    the same applies electric and gravitational forces. (then there’s the whole Einstien’s space & time curvature thing which says there’s no gravity attraction but let’s not get into that)
    let’s just say we both agree on that.

  130. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 9:30 pm

    [..YouTube..] @XehanortNobody
    radio receivers or machinery can detect waves that are traveling within space,
    say a robot that receives the signal via electro-magnetic waves will begin to move and behavior
    if that’s what you’re arguing then yes, waves CAN move physical objects.
    the same applies electric and gravitational forces. (then there’s the whole Einstien’s space & time curvature thing which says there’s no gravity attraction but let’s not get into that)
    let’s just say we both agree on that.

  131. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 9:30 pm

    [..YouTube..] radio receivers or machinery can detect waves that are traveling within space,
    say a robot that receives the signal via electro-magnetic waves will begin to move and behavior
    if that’s what you’re arguing then yes, waves CAN move physical objects.
    the same applies electric and gravitational forces. (then there’s the whole Einstien’s space & time curvature thing which says there’s no gravity attraction but let’s not get into that)
    let’s just say we both agree on that.

  132. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 9:35 pm

    [..YouTube..] @XehanortNobody
    oh and you don’t agree with the video. yeah I got it
    didn’t see your other comment when i replied.
    = p

  133. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 9:35 pm

    [..YouTube..] @XehanortNobody
    oh and you don’t agree with the video. yeah I got it
    didn’t see your other comment when i replied.
    = p

  134. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 9:35 pm

    [..YouTube..] @XehanortNobody
    oh and you don’t agree with the video. yeah I got it
    didn’t see your other comment when i replied.
    = p

  135. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 9:35 pm

    [..YouTube..] @XehanortNobody
    oh and you don’t agree with the video. yeah I got it
    didn’t see your other comment when i replied.
    = p

  136. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 9:35 pm

    [..YouTube..] @XehanortNobody
    oh and you don’t agree with the video. yeah I got it
    didn’t see your other comment when i replied.
    = p

  137. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 9:35 pm

    [..YouTube..] oh and you don’t agree with the video. yeah I got it
    didn’t see your other comment when i replied.
    = p

  138. XehanortNobodyNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 10:00 pm

    [..YouTube..] @superdahoho

    I agree with some parts of the video and disagree with others.

  139. XehanortNobodyNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 10:00 pm

    [..YouTube..] @superdahoho

    I agree with some parts of the video and disagree with others.

  140. XehanortNobodyNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 10:00 pm

    [..YouTube..] @superdahoho

    I agree with some parts of the video and disagree with others.

  141. XehanortNobodyNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 10:00 pm

    [..YouTube..] @superdahoho

    I agree with some parts of the video and disagree with others.

  142. XehanortNobodyNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 10:00 pm

    [..YouTube..] @superdahoho

    I agree with some parts of the video and disagree with others.

  143. XehanortNobodyNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 10:00 pm

    [..YouTube..] @superdahoho

    I agree with some parts of the video and disagree with others.

  144. XehanortNobodyNo Gravatar on November 1, 2011 10:00 pm

    [..YouTube..] I agree with some parts of the video and disagree with others.

  145. jeroenhaanNo Gravatar on November 2, 2011 3:42 pm

    [..YouTube..] @superdahoho

    What about nonlocality?

  146. jeroenhaanNo Gravatar on November 2, 2011 3:42 pm

    [..YouTube..] @superdahoho

    What about nonlocality?

  147. jeroenhaanNo Gravatar on November 2, 2011 3:42 pm

    [..YouTube..] @superdahoho

    What about nonlocality?

  148. jeroenhaanNo Gravatar on November 2, 2011 3:42 pm

    [..YouTube..] @superdahoho

    What about nonlocality?

  149. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 2, 2011 4:27 pm

    [..YouTube..] @jeroenhaan
    yeah we already established that
    electromagnetic and gravitational forces work as waves (besides the space curvature)
    but brain waves still do not alter-reality like he claimed in this video

  150. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 2, 2011 4:27 pm

    [..YouTube..] @jeroenhaan
    yeah we already established that
    electromagnetic and gravitational forces work as waves (besides the space curvature)
    but brain waves still do not alter-reality like he claimed in this video

  151. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 2, 2011 4:27 pm

    [..YouTube..] @jeroenhaan
    yeah we already established that
    electromagnetic and gravitational forces work as waves (besides the space curvature)
    but brain waves still do not alter-reality like he claimed in this video

  152. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 2, 2011 4:27 pm

    [..YouTube..] @jeroenhaan
    yeah we already established that
    electromagnetic and gravitational forces work as waves (besides the space curvature)
    but brain waves still do not alter-reality like he claimed in this video

  153. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 2, 2011 4:27 pm

    [..YouTube..] @jeroenhaan
    yeah we already established that
    electromagnetic and gravitational forces work as waves (besides the space curvature)
    but brain waves still do not alter-reality like he claimed in this video

  154. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 2, 2011 4:27 pm

    [..YouTube..] @jeroenhaan
    yeah we already established that
    electromagnetic and gravitational forces work as waves (besides the space curvature)
    but brain waves still do not alter-reality like he claimed in this video

  155. superdahohoNo Gravatar on November 2, 2011 4:27 pm

    [..YouTube..] yeah we already established that
    electromagnetic and gravitational forces work as waves (besides the space curvature)
    but brain waves still do not alter-reality like he claimed in this video

  156. mythmanjayNo Gravatar on November 7, 2011 12:01 pm

    [..YouTube..] In other words, let reality be the way you want it; ‘however it actually is’ being its defiance against you?

  157. mythmanjayNo Gravatar on November 7, 2011 12:01 pm

    [..YouTube..] In other words, let reality be the way you want it; ‘however it actually is’ being its defiance against you?

  158. mythmanjayNo Gravatar on November 7, 2011 12:01 pm

    [..YouTube..] In other words, let reality be the way you want it; ‘however it actually is’ being its defiance against you?

  159. mythmanjayNo Gravatar on November 7, 2011 12:01 pm

    [..YouTube..] In other words, let reality be the way you want it; ‘however it actually is’ being its defiance against you?

  160. mythmanjayNo Gravatar on November 7, 2011 12:01 pm

    [..YouTube..] In other words, let reality be the way you want it; ‘however it actually is’ being its defiance against you?

  161. mythmanjayNo Gravatar on November 7, 2011 12:01 pm

    [..YouTube..] In other words, let reality be the way you want it; ‘however it actually is’ being its defiance against you?

  162. boogafartNo Gravatar on November 15, 2011 5:15 am

    [..YouTube..] this video could have been cut down to 1 minute if he cut a lot of the crap

  163. boogafartNo Gravatar on November 15, 2011 5:15 am

    [..YouTube..] this video could have been cut down to 1 minute if he cut a lot of the crap

  164. boogafartNo Gravatar on November 15, 2011 5:15 am

    [..YouTube..] this video could have been cut down to 1 minute if he cut a lot of the crap

  165. boogafartNo Gravatar on November 15, 2011 5:15 am

    [..YouTube..] this video could have been cut down to 1 minute if he cut a lot of the crap

  166. boogafartNo Gravatar on November 15, 2011 5:15 am

    [..YouTube..] this video could have been cut down to 1 minute if he cut a lot of the crap

  167. boogafartNo Gravatar on November 15, 2011 5:15 am

    [..YouTube..] this video could have been cut down to 1 minute if he cut a lot of the crap

  168. angelroth4992No Gravatar on December 4, 2011 8:04 pm

    [..YouTube..] the thing is that so many times Ive tried to visualize and believe that i can change something in my life or that some specific situation will happen but it always ends up going differently

  169. angelroth4992No Gravatar on December 4, 2011 8:04 pm

    [..YouTube..] the thing is that so many times Ive tried to visualize and believe that i can change something in my life or that some specific situation will happen but it always ends up going differently

  170. angelroth4992No Gravatar on December 4, 2011 8:04 pm

    [..YouTube..] the thing is that so many times Ive tried to visualize and believe that i can change something in my life or that some specific situation will happen but it always ends up going differently

  171. angelroth4992No Gravatar on December 4, 2011 8:04 pm

    [..YouTube..] the thing is that so many times Ive tried to visualize and believe that i can change something in my life or that some specific situation will happen but it always ends up going differently

  172. angelroth4992No Gravatar on December 4, 2011 8:04 pm

    [..YouTube..] the thing is that so many times Ive tried to visualize and believe that i can change something in my life or that some specific situation will happen but it always ends up going differently

  173. angelroth4992No Gravatar on December 4, 2011 8:04 pm

    [..YouTube..] the thing is that so many times Ive tried to visualize and believe that i can change something in my life or that some specific situation will happen but it always ends up going differently

  174. ObviouslyRandomUserNo Gravatar on December 5, 2011 4:55 pm

    [..YouTube..] so if I imagine myself flying above the clouds and towards the sunset then shooting a kamehameha while am at it, will that happen?

  175. ObviouslyRandomUserNo Gravatar on December 5, 2011 4:55 pm

    [..YouTube..] so if I imagine myself flying above the clouds and towards the sunset then shooting a kamehameha while am at it, will that happen?

  176. ObviouslyRandomUserNo Gravatar on December 5, 2011 4:55 pm

    [..YouTube..] so if I imagine myself flying above the clouds and towards the sunset then shooting a kamehameha while am at it, will that happen?

  177. ObviouslyRandomUserNo Gravatar on December 5, 2011 4:55 pm

    [..YouTube..] so if I imagine myself flying above the clouds and towards the sunset then shooting a kamehameha while am at it, will that happen?

  178. ObviouslyRandomUserNo Gravatar on December 5, 2011 4:55 pm

    [..YouTube..] so if I imagine myself flying above the clouds and towards the sunset then shooting a kamehameha while am at it, will that happen?

  179. xFuBaRxSkilLzNo Gravatar on December 8, 2011 6:11 pm

    [..YouTube..] @deathtamer666 Without your perception there is no reality. What reality is to a schizophrenic person is not reality to you. Everybody has a different reality. You would not exist in my world if I had never read this comment and responded to it.

  180. xFuBaRxSkilLzNo Gravatar on December 8, 2011 6:11 pm

    [..YouTube..] @deathtamer666 Without your perception there is no reality. What reality is to a schizophrenic person is not reality to you. Everybody has a different reality. You would not exist in my world if I had never read this comment and responded to it.

  181. xFuBaRxSkilLzNo Gravatar on December 8, 2011 6:11 pm

    [..YouTube..] @deathtamer666 Without your perception there is no reality. What reality is to a schizophrenic person is not reality to you. Everybody has a different reality. You would not exist in my world if I had never read this comment and responded to it.

  182. xFuBaRxSkilLzNo Gravatar on December 8, 2011 6:11 pm

    [..YouTube..] @deathtamer666 Without your perception there is no reality. What reality is to a schizophrenic person is not reality to you. Everybody has a different reality. You would not exist in my world if I had never read this comment and responded to it.

  183. xFuBaRxSkilLzNo Gravatar on December 8, 2011 6:11 pm

    [..YouTube..] @deathtamer666 Without your perception there is no reality. What reality is to a schizophrenic person is not reality to you. Everybody has a different reality. You would not exist in my world if I had never read this comment and responded to it.

  184. xFuBaRxSkilLzNo Gravatar on December 8, 2011 6:11 pm

    [..YouTube..] @deathtamer666 Without your perception there is no reality. What reality is to a schizophrenic person is not reality to you. Everybody has a different reality. You would not exist in my world if I had never read this comment and responded to it.

  185. xFuBaRxSkilLzNo Gravatar on December 8, 2011 6:11 pm

    [..YouTube..] Without your perception there is no reality. What reality is to a schizophrenic person is not reality to you. Everybody has a different reality. You would not exist in my world if I had never read this comment and responded to it.

  186. xFuBaRxSkilLzNo Gravatar on December 8, 2011 6:11 pm

    Without your perception there is no reality. What reality is to a schizophrenic person is not reality to you. Everybody has a different reality. You would not exist in my world if I had never read this comment and responded to it.

  187. xFuBaRxSkilLzNo Gravatar on December 8, 2011 6:13 pm

    [..YouTube..] @ObviouslyRandomUser If you believe it strongly enough it might happen in your reality, but other people might not see it and classify you as sick, or assign you one of the many disorders.

  188. xFuBaRxSkilLzNo Gravatar on December 8, 2011 6:13 pm

    [..YouTube..] @ObviouslyRandomUser If you believe it strongly enough it might happen in your reality, but other people might not see it and classify you as sick, or assign you one of the many disorders.

  189. xFuBaRxSkilLzNo Gravatar on December 8, 2011 6:13 pm

    [..YouTube..] @ObviouslyRandomUser If you believe it strongly enough it might happen in your reality, but other people might not see it and classify you as sick, or assign you one of the many disorders.

  190. xFuBaRxSkilLzNo Gravatar on December 8, 2011 6:13 pm

    [..YouTube..] @ObviouslyRandomUser If you believe it strongly enough it might happen in your reality, but other people might not see it and classify you as sick, or assign you one of the many disorders.

  191. xFuBaRxSkilLzNo Gravatar on December 8, 2011 6:13 pm

    [..YouTube..] @ObviouslyRandomUser If you believe it strongly enough it might happen in your reality, but other people might not see it and classify you as sick, or assign you one of the many disorders.

  192. xFuBaRxSkilLzNo Gravatar on December 8, 2011 6:13 pm

    [..YouTube..] @ObviouslyRandomUser If you believe it strongly enough it might happen in your reality, but other people might not see it and classify you as sick, or assign you one of the many disorders.

  193. xFuBaRxSkilLzNo Gravatar on December 8, 2011 6:13 pm

    [..YouTube..] If you believe it strongly enough it might happen in your reality, but other people might not see it and classify you as sick, or assign you one of the many disorders.

  194. xFuBaRxSkilLzNo Gravatar on December 8, 2011 6:13 pm

    If you believe it strongly enough it might happen in your reality, but other people might not see it and classify you as sick, or assign you one of the many disorders.

  195. deathtamer666No Gravatar on December 8, 2011 7:26 pm

    [..YouTube..] @xFuBaRxSkilLz I shall reiterate this: “eh, i would bother posting my counter argument to that but i am getting tired of this meaningless bickering and wish to continue with better and more interesting topics.”

  196. deathtamer666No Gravatar on December 8, 2011 7:26 pm

    [..YouTube..] @xFuBaRxSkilLz I shall reiterate this: “eh, i would bother posting my counter argument to that but i am getting tired of this meaningless bickering and wish to continue with better and more interesting topics.”

  197. deathtamer666No Gravatar on December 8, 2011 7:26 pm

    [..YouTube..] @xFuBaRxSkilLz I shall reiterate this: “eh, i would bother posting my counter argument to that but i am getting tired of this meaningless bickering and wish to continue with better and more interesting topics.”

  198. deathtamer666No Gravatar on December 8, 2011 7:26 pm

    [..YouTube..] @xFuBaRxSkilLz I shall reiterate this: “eh, i would bother posting my counter argument to that but i am getting tired of this meaningless bickering and wish to continue with better and more interesting topics.”

  199. deathtamer666No Gravatar on December 8, 2011 7:26 pm

    [..YouTube..] @xFuBaRxSkilLz I shall reiterate this: “eh, i would bother posting my counter argument to that but i am getting tired of this meaningless bickering and wish to continue with better and more interesting topics.”

  200. deathtamer666No Gravatar on December 8, 2011 7:26 pm

    [..YouTube..] @xFuBaRxSkilLz I shall reiterate this: “eh, i would bother posting my counter argument to that but i am getting tired of this meaningless bickering and wish to continue with better and more interesting topics.”

  201. deathtamer666No Gravatar on December 8, 2011 7:26 pm

    [..YouTube..] I shall reiterate this: “eh, i would bother posting my counter argument to that but i am getting tired of this meaningless bickering and wish to continue with better and more interesting topics.”

  202. deathtamer666No Gravatar on December 8, 2011 7:26 pm

    I shall reiterate this: “eh, i would bother posting my counter argument to that but i am getting tired of this meaningless bickering and wish to continue with better and more interesting topics.”

  203. ObviouslyRandomUserNo Gravatar on December 8, 2011 8:28 pm

    [..YouTube..] @xFuBaRxSkilLz I was joking. people classify this as humor. xD

  204. ObviouslyRandomUserNo Gravatar on December 8, 2011 8:28 pm

    [..YouTube..] @xFuBaRxSkilLz I was joking. people classify this as humor. xD

  205. ObviouslyRandomUserNo Gravatar on December 8, 2011 8:28 pm

    [..YouTube..] @xFuBaRxSkilLz I was joking. people classify this as humor. xD

  206. ObviouslyRandomUserNo Gravatar on December 8, 2011 8:28 pm

    [..YouTube..] @xFuBaRxSkilLz I was joking. people classify this as humor. xD

  207. ObviouslyRandomUserNo Gravatar on December 8, 2011 8:28 pm

    [..YouTube..] @xFuBaRxSkilLz I was joking. people classify this as humor. xD

  208. ObviouslyRandomUserNo Gravatar on December 8, 2011 8:28 pm

    [..YouTube..] @xFuBaRxSkilLz I was joking. people classify this as humor. xD

  209. ObviouslyRandomUserNo Gravatar on December 8, 2011 8:28 pm

    [..YouTube..] I was joking. people classify this as humor. xD

  210. ObviouslyRandomUserNo Gravatar on December 8, 2011 8:28 pm

    [..YouTube..] I was joking. people classify this as humor. xD

  211. ماجد القاسمNo Gravatar on December 8, 2011 8:28 pm

    I was joking. people classify this as humor. xD

  212. ImABeastAndIPwnUNo Gravatar on December 9, 2011 7:50 pm

    [..YouTube..] Your changing how you are thinking of the task, that is all, not reality. As Charlie Sheen said “Can’t is the cancer of happen,” all you are doing is thinking past the problem not at it.

  213. ImABeastAndIPwnUNo Gravatar on December 9, 2011 7:50 pm

    [..YouTube..] Your changing how you are thinking of the task, that is all, not reality. As Charlie Sheen said “Can’t is the cancer of happen,” all you are doing is thinking past the problem not at it.

  214. ImABeastAndIPwnUNo Gravatar on December 9, 2011 7:50 pm

    [..YouTube..] Your changing how you are thinking of the task, that is all, not reality. As Charlie Sheen said “Can’t is the cancer of happen,” all you are doing is thinking past the problem not at it.

  215. ImABeastAndIPwnUNo Gravatar on December 9, 2011 7:50 pm

    [..YouTube..] Your changing how you are thinking of the task, that is all, not reality. As Charlie Sheen said “Can’t is the cancer of happen,” all you are doing is thinking past the problem not at it. 

  216. ImABeastAndIPwnUNo Gravatar on December 9, 2011 7:50 pm

    [..YouTube..] Your changing how you are thinking of the task, that is all, not reality. As Charlie Sheen said “Can’t is the cancer of happen,” all you are doing is thinking past the problem not at it.

  217. ImABeastAndIPwnUNo Gravatar on December 9, 2011 7:50 pm

    Your changing how you are thinking of the task, that is all, not reality. As Charlie Sheen said “Can’t is the cancer of happen,” all you are doing is thinking past the problem not at it.

  218. kinnexsusNo Gravatar on December 30, 2011 12:30 am

    [..YouTube..] Shit bro I was like nawww your wrong then I tried it with a jar and was like what the fuck it worked

    Cool bro

  219. kinnexsusNo Gravatar on December 30, 2011 12:34 am

    [..YouTube..] Guys I think that by thinking of having the object makes your brain desire it so releases muscular energy to do whatever it can to, (get the jar open) and it that affect it only feels easier because your are distracted of the effort by your surprise to see your own sucsess

  220. GGPvideosNo Gravatar on January 11, 2012 1:04 pm

    [..YouTube..] @kinnexsus You’re correct. Strength is a function of the nervous system, not muscles. By letting go, you open your neurological pathways to allow more energy to easily flow through them, hence, the power to open the jar.

  221. GGPvideosNo Gravatar on January 11, 2012 1:04 pm

    @kinnexsus You’re correct. Strength is a function of the nervous system, not muscles. By letting go, you open your neurological pathways to allow more energy to easily flow through them, hence, the power to open the jar.

  222. GGPvideosNo Gravatar on January 11, 2012 1:07 pm

    [..YouTube..] @ImABeastAndIPwnU What the fuck is reality but the way you think? The problem isn’t reality, it’s the way you’re perceiving your own thought. So technically you are right to say that you’re thinking “past” the problem, because it’s all in your head anyway. When you want to hit a target you don’t throw at it, you throw THROUGH it.

  223. GGPvideosNo Gravatar on January 11, 2012 1:07 pm

    [..YouTube..] What the fuck is reality but the way you think? The problem isn’t reality, it’s the way you’re perceiving your own thought. So technically you are right to say that you’re thinking “past” the problem, because it’s all in your head anyway. When you want to hit a target you don’t throw at it, you throw THROUGH it.

  224. GGPvideosNo Gravatar on January 11, 2012 1:07 pm

    What the fuck is reality but the way you think? The problem isn’t reality, it’s the way you’re perceiving your own thought. So technically you are right to say that you’re thinking “past” the problem, because it’s all in your head anyway. When you want to hit a target you don’t throw at it, you throw THROUGH it.

  225. bvgattiNo Gravatar on January 23, 2012 4:29 am

    [..YouTube..] i think ,there is no such thing as reality like there is no such thing as time.
    if mamal brain is capable of imagening,dreaming and choosing ,why not thoughts ideas or any form of illusions or halucinations froms are unconscious realms. thoughts in a mind of someone or something ,in there own dream of reality.as if we exist only due 2 elctro magnetic impulse of some kind a reaction in the mind of this manifested universe .a ride in a dream, experiencing the moment of our awarness as life beings

  226. bvgattiNo Gravatar on January 23, 2012 4:29 am

    [..YouTube..] i think ,there is no such thing as reality like there is no such thing as time.
    if mamal brain is capable of imagening,dreaming and choosing ,why not thoughts ideas or any form of illusions or halucinations froms are unconscious realms. thoughts in a mind of someone or something ,in there own dream of reality.as if we exist only due 2 elctro magnetic impulse of some kind a reaction in the mind of this manifested universe .a ride in a dream, experiencing the moment of our awarness as life beings

  227. bvgattiNo Gravatar on January 23, 2012 4:29 am

    i think ,there is no such thing as reality like there is no such thing as time.
    if mamal brain is capable of imagening,dreaming and choosing ,why not thoughts ideas or any form of illusions or halucinations froms are unconscious realms. thoughts in a mind of someone or something ,in there own dream of reality.as if we exist only due 2 elctro magnetic impulse of some kind a reaction in the mind of this manifested universe .a ride in a dream, experiencing the moment of our awarness as life beings

  228. bazbakhtyarmuhammedNo Gravatar on January 24, 2012 6:08 am

    [..YouTube..] reality is a state of mind..

  229. bazbakhtyarmuhammedNo Gravatar on January 24, 2012 6:08 am

    [..YouTube..] reality is a state of mind..

  230. bazbakhtyarmuhammedNo Gravatar on January 24, 2012 6:08 am

    reality is a state of mind..

  231. andypmz07No Gravatar on February 17, 2012 11:44 pm

    [..YouTube..] @deathtamer666 your perception is reality.

  232. andypmz07No Gravatar on February 17, 2012 11:44 pm

    [..YouTube..] your perception is reality.

  233. andypmz07No Gravatar on February 17, 2012 11:44 pm

    your perception is reality.

  234. VBProfessional22No Gravatar on March 5, 2012 10:43 am

    [..YouTube..] 1:12 you looked p to the right…. Does this say anything to you?

  235. VBProfessional22No Gravatar on March 5, 2012 10:43 am

    1:12 you looked p to the right…. Does this say anything to you?

  236. delicruxNo Gravatar on April 3, 2012 7:10 am

    [..YouTube..] i’ve done this with traffic lights when i don’t want to stop and they just changed ill have to get it on camera some day good video.

    if every thing is made of energy and thought is energy as well then thought can effect and be effected by energy therefor stay positive and will your own success.

  237. delicruxNo Gravatar on April 3, 2012 7:10 am

    i’ve done this with traffic lights when i don’t want to stop and they just changed ill have to get it on camera some day good video.

    if every thing is made of energy and thought is energy as well then thought can effect and be effected by energy therefor stay positive and will your own success.

  238. edwardthomasbennett1No Gravatar on April 5, 2012 9:40 pm

    [..YouTube..] actually you are shifting to parallel realities. Everything already exits

  239. edwardthomasbennett1No Gravatar on April 5, 2012 9:40 pm

    actually you are shifting to parallel realities. Everything already exits

  240. PeteyPobz93No Gravatar on April 8, 2012 9:09 pm

    [..YouTube..] each person creates their own reality. to say each person experiences reality differently would be a false statement.

  241. PeteyPobz93No Gravatar on April 8, 2012 9:09 pm

    each person creates their own reality. to say each person experiences reality differently would be a false statement.

  242. sushi making party londonNo Gravatar on April 11, 2012 9:25 am

    Another great video.

  243. n0morehateNo Gravatar on April 19, 2012 2:05 pm

    [..YouTube..] hello fellow Canadian,, please leave my country, idiots don’t belong here

  244. n0morehateNo Gravatar on April 19, 2012 2:05 pm

    hello fellow Canadian,, please leave my country, idiots don’t belong here

  245. Sweetbarbiegirl7No Gravatar on April 22, 2012 7:19 pm

    [..YouTube..] Been listening to him for the past 2 minutes and I i heard was hot sauce:D He is soo cute:)

  246. Sweetbarbiegirl7No Gravatar on April 22, 2012 7:19 pm

    Been listening to him for the past 2 minutes and I i heard was hot sauce:D He is soo cute:)

  247. FeelingFreshSonNo Gravatar on April 28, 2012 3:27 am

    [..YouTube..] I get what your saying but it’s still not “reality”. It’s not “noumena”.
    “the world and state of things can exist if that state is observed”
    That’s an idealistic position. And nobody has to observe the objective universe, that’s why it’s objective. I believe these to be purely intellectual abstractions though. Mostly word games really. Point is, different strokes for different folks.

  248. theelaw1No Gravatar on May 8, 2012 4:14 pm

    [..YouTube..] this guy talks shit

  249. Nicholas LawNo Gravatar on May 8, 2012 4:14 pm

    this guy talks shit

  250. speedcoregewaltNo Gravatar on May 8, 2012 7:16 pm

    [..YouTube..] “Your Mind Can Bend Reality (And I Can Prove It)” lol Hallucinations FTW

  251. speedcoregewaltNo Gravatar on May 8, 2012 7:16 pm

    “Your Mind Can Bend Reality (And I Can Prove It)” lol Hallucinations FTW

  252. ninjanoobkingkongNo Gravatar on June 15, 2012 9:28 am

    It’s faster to run the hot sauce under hot water.

  253. Ignacio MaganaNo Gravatar on June 27, 2012 4:03 pm

    There is no logic and/or rigor in any of your abstract arguments. Therefore your proof is ambiguous and probably wrong.

  254. spareaxeNo Gravatar on July 18, 2012 6:45 pm

    it is a lot of non truth dude…..total fake!!

  255. WakeUpInDaMorning1No Gravatar on August 14, 2012 7:15 am

    Jump off a building and do a belly flop on the concrete floor without getting harmed and then we’ll talk reality bending. FYI, unlike “reality bending”, reality hacking is RAEL! It’s based on chemicals. Watch the movie “limitless”, and then you’ll REALLY see! NZT 2.0 exist in real life. It’s more of a study aid than a nootropic though. Nootropics are NOT the same as cognitive enhancers. Cognitive enhancers are toxic and hurt long term while nootropics are safe and safely increases memory and IQ!

  256. barkapeNo Gravatar on September 7, 2012 12:11 am

    and who says the world can only exist if is observed? so u think u dont exist when ur asleep? makes a lot of sense. just just the fuck up and stop making videos

  257. Jay DeeNo Gravatar on September 19, 2012 6:51 pm

    If you watch Gregg Braden’s Science of Miracles, he explains, in scientific terms, what this video is talking about.

  258. rutra1996No Gravatar on October 8, 2012 4:46 pm

    Oh my god, it is proved! Now nobody can tell that this doesn’t work and when a coincidence happen you notice and tell the story, from now nobody will tell me that this is only a scam and the people who say that don’t know anything about science and just want to sell their products. By now, it is proved!!The next step is to accept the james randi’ s challenge and prove it scientifically winning a million dollars!! Lets go people, lets change the world!

  259. shobymsNo Gravatar on October 15, 2012 9:42 am

    I went to a club and imagined that I kissed the gorgeous in the corner and then asked her to dance with me. Guess what? …….0-0!

  260. Quantumcola69No Gravatar on November 29, 2012 1:36 pm

    In my opinion. This could only work for the morphing of situations pertaining to one’s own ability.
    If you invision yourself in an experience normally generated by your own aptitude to bring it about through your own actions, the positive effect is undeniable.
    It causes the brain to fufill what it believes has already been done, which in turn inspires confidence and a sense of mental commitment to fall in line with the percieved reality.
    Of course, this doesn’t mean you can perform the absolu

  261. James HarperNo Gravatar on December 30, 2012 11:02 pm

    Fuckin idiot !!! LMFAO for Eva!

  262. KingAdonisDNANo Gravatar on January 4, 2013 6:04 pm

    Anedotal bullshit. You don’t prove anything in this video, all you do is provide a great example for confrimnation bias.

  263. bigj42088No Gravatar on January 10, 2013 11:40 pm

    What’s with the sound in the back round

  264. AzzABlaNo Gravatar on January 15, 2013 9:39 pm

    achally steve, the object or “reality” is altered upon observation, meaning everything everybody has ever witnessed is infact unrealistic to “realities” true nature. what we perceive is but our limited sensory organs best interpretation of “reality”. furthermore reality in and of itself is flawed outside of collective consciousness. 2 observers viewing the same event will still see it from different angles, and even tho reality will never be shared on this plain, theyre still valid reality ^.^

  265. Amanda WestNo Gravatar on January 22, 2013 10:45 am

    When I was younger and participated in sports. I noticed that when I visualized myself making plays, that they actually played out like I had imagined. I saw a documentary the other night about the science of sleep, and it touched on a similar topic. They proved that Non-REM sleep is where your brain plays over the days events and tries to predict better outcomes. In a sleep study, when awoken in nonREM the dreamer would perform better on a test that they failed prior to going sleeping.

  266. DentchiNo Gravatar on February 5, 2013 1:18 am

    lmao full of bullshit

  267. IRONnugget09No Gravatar on February 6, 2013 9:50 pm

    PART 1: Hmm, to me reality is the acceptance of your perspective. As for proving your reality to somebody else. This is tricky, since we all see colors differently, some are blind, deaf, etc. Well I drew out a little model in a few minutes today in class and i think i figured out how you can either have a.) Have the same exact observation of something. Or b.) see someones perspective of reality.

  268. IRONnugget09No Gravatar on February 6, 2013 9:50 pm

    PART 1: Hmm, to me reality is the acceptance of your perspective. As for proving your reality to somebody else. This is tricky, since we all see colors differently, some are blind, deaf, etc. Well I drew out a little model in a few minutes today in class and i think i figured out how you can either have a.) Have the same exact observation of something. Or b.) see someones perspective of reality.

  269. IRONnugget09No Gravatar on February 6, 2013 9:53 pm

    PART 2: What I am talking about is the theory of shared dreaming. Now there are thousands of claims of shared dreaming, and I have actually had 2 in my life. The important one was with my best friend. His walls in his bedroom look green to me in waking life but in the dream, they were a blue color. What I am saying is that if we can enter someone elses dream, we can in fact see their perception of reality. Since our subconcious fills our dreams with observations of waking life.

  270. IRONnugget09No Gravatar on February 6, 2013 9:53 pm

    PART 2: What I am talking about is the theory of shared dreaming. Now there are thousands of claims of shared dreaming, and I have actually had 2 in my life. The important one was with my best friend. His walls in his bedroom look green to me in waking life but in the dream, they were a blue color. What I am saying is that if we can enter someone elses dream, we can in fact see their perception of reality. Since our subconcious fills our dreams with observations of waking life.

  271. IRONnugget09No Gravatar on February 6, 2013 9:58 pm

    PART 3: Another theory is, when we dream, we actually go to a place called the dreamscape. Which is one big blanket of shared dream space that our subconcious navigates us through at night. If we could all go to the same exact spot in the dreamscape, the colors would all be experienced the same since the dreamscape is filling the colors and you’re not perceiving them through an eye. With this being said, the only way we can prove reality is through something we have all viewed as a falsehood.

  272. IRONnugget09No Gravatar on February 6, 2013 9:58 pm

    PART 3: Another theory is, when we dream, we actually go to a place called the dreamscape. Which is one big blanket of shared dream space that our subconcious navigates us through at night. If we could all go to the same exact spot in the dreamscape, the colors would all be experienced the same since the dreamscape is filling the colors and you’re not perceiving them through an eye. With this being said, the only way we can prove reality is through something we have all viewed as a falsehood.

  273. Raj MitraNo Gravatar on February 26, 2013 10:48 pm

    subscribed :)

  274. Wes HughesNo Gravatar on May 6, 2013 6:26 am

    I don’t believe people who use photons…jk no i do believe in the mind realty distortion field

  275. johnny102marvinNo Gravatar on May 14, 2013 11:40 pm

    You are right. One should practice using their mind everyday even on simple things like opening a jar. I do it at the gym when I am lifting heavy weights. You can do it anywhere, and everywhere, just use your imagination on how to use this power and you will come up with some really interesting interventions.

Name (required)

Email (required)

Website

Speak your mind

Subscribe without commenting